Single molecule, one million times smaller than a grain of sand, pictured for first time

By Claire Bates
Last updated at 7:39 PM on 28th August 2009

It may look like a piece of honeycomb, but this lattice-shaped image is the first ever close-up view of a single molecule.

Scientists from IBM used an atomic force microscope (AFM) to reveal the chemical bonds within a molecule.

'This is the first time that all the atoms in a molecule have been imaged,' lead researcher Leo Gross said.

pentacene

The delicate inner structure of a pentacene molecule has been imaged with an atomic force microscope

The researchers focused on a single molecule of pentacene, which is commonly used in solar cells. The rectangular-shaped organic molecule is made up of 22 carbon atoms and 14 hydrogen atoms.

In the image above the hexagonal shapes of the five carbon rings are clear and even the positions of the hydrogen atoms around the carbon rings can be seen.

To give some perspective, the space between the carbon rings is only 0.14 nanometers across, which is roughly one million times smaller than the diameter of a grain of sand.

Textbook model: A computer-generated image of how we're used to seeing a molecule represented with balls and sticks

Textbook model: A computer-generated image of how we're used to seeing a molecule represented with balls and sticks

'If you think about how a doctor uses an X-ray to image bones and organs inside the human body, we are using the atomic force microscope to image the atomic structures that are the backbones of individual molecules,' said IBM researcher Gerhard Meyer.

3d

A 3D view showing how a single carbon monoxide molecule was used to create the image using a 'tuning fork' effect

The team from IBM Research Zurich said the results could have a huge impact of the field of nanotechnology, which seeks to understand and control some of the smallest objects known to mankind.

The AFM uses a sharp metal tip that acts like a tuning fork to measure the tiny forces between the tip and the molecule. This requires great precision as the tip moves within a nanometer of the sample.

'Above the skeleton of the molecular backbone (of the pentacene) you get a different detuning than above the surface the molecule is lying on,' Mr Gross said.

This detuning is then measured and converted into an image.

To stop the tip from absorbing the pentacene molecule, the researchers replaced the metal with a single molecule of carbon monoxide. This was found to be more stable and created weaker electrostatic attractions with the pentacene, creating a higher resolution image.

Enlarge   IBM researchers

IBM researchers Nikolaj Moll, Reto Schlittler, Gerhard Meyer, Fabian Mohn and Leo Gross (l-r) stand behind an atomic force microscope Photo taken by Michael Lowry Image courtesy of IBM Research - Zurich

The experiment was also performed inside a high vacuum at the extremely cold temperature of -268C to avoid stray gas molecules or atomic vibrations from affecting the measurements.

'Eventually we want to investigate using molecules for molecular electronics,' Mr Gross said.

'We want to use molecules as wires or logic switches or elements.'

 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

This may be the first AFM image of a single discrete molecule but images of single atoms and lattice structures have been around for some time. I studied UHV x-ray and photoelectron techniques in grad school.

Regarding all the comments about religion, you people are ignorant as this merely shows that the Universe operates under specific laws and symmetries. It says nothing of the existance (or non-existance) of a higher power. Quit trying to justify your beliefs through science you do not even understand.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Religion: Cough, cough.....Yawn.......ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........

Click to rate     Rating   2

I'm suggesting that these findings were simply "planted" by a certain force to throw us off the real trail & discovery of the creation of most everything.

Click to rate     Rating   1

...Norm De Plume apparently wants it both ways; "...I do wish the (sic) Americans would simply STOP posting on the Daily Mail..." and, then, "...mike cunningham,costa mesa, USA, I agree 100% with your comment."

I find while browsing that many Europeans think the American people in general have "prehistoric" views. Many of these critics cannot express themselves succinctly in print. There is, of course, a flow in the opposite direction with equally suspect written behavior...

If you write the way you think...

cg

Click to rate     Rating   2

Dave Boothby:

You're mixing up the scientific and the reverential. Just because pure materialist analysis doesn't (may never) tell why there's something rather than nothing (yet, at any rate) that doesn't mean that scientific analysis falls short. It gives a new look into what's true and it's beautiful for that reason and others too. Questions increase after each discovery. They don't decrease when a question is "answered." That might have something to do with the infinite. Anyhow, leave that one for the mathematicians and the philosophers of language and the theologians. Enjoy the science.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

@MS, Chicago, re. your other points:

"Some" of the most brilliant minds may indeed be religious, but two things to bear in mind:

1) these days, mostly in the Einsteinian sense (rules out nonsense like belief in resurrection, miracles, a judgmental deity, etc)

2) they are greatly out-numbered by those brilliant minds who are not religious.

Religion a strictly personal matter? I completely agree.

As for your question of there being an enormous correlation between intelligence and race? Depends if you remove all the other factors connected with race likely to impact that correlation. Few studies have been conducted, but what you're left with is evidence of some, but it's certainly not strong.

Apologies if the truth hurts and the only way to vent that hurt is by clicking the red down arrow - not that that's a very Christian thing to do!

Click to rate     Rating   6

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Your name and location will appear next to your comment.
You have 1000 characters left.
We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms